After Three Months, What's Next?

There's been much speculation about the SMO and where it's heading after three months. Many are confused by the Outlaw US Empire's Information War and ask why Russia hasn't cremated Ukraine yet with its superior arms and soldiers, which happens to be the wrong question. Clearly, we must have a brief review about Russia, Russians and Putin. Much of the initial discussion related to the Security Proposals and other related matter is present in the articles I produced at the time and remain available on my Wall. Please review them as needed.

Russia promotes the vision of the UN Charter and the Law that flows from it.

Russians play chess, not poker, and thus might feint but never bluff. Russians also feel they only need to say something once, and thus very, very rarely repeat themselves.

Putin is as Russian as a Russian can get. And on top of that, he's brilliant as in extremely intelligent. Plus, Putin is the lead member of a team of very intelligent Russians. Despite appearances, the vast majority of decisions are made collectively.

Putin and his team put forth a set of proposals based on OSCE Security Treaties that had already been consented to by all OSCE members. The type of response to the December proposal informed the team that all NATO/OSCE members were going to break their treaty obligations, thus the military technical response would be forthcoming. At a briefing in November, Putin was again informed of the Genocidal conditions in Donbass, and thus the probability of a Russian version of an R2P operation was highly likely. As we've seen as the SMO has unfolded, other distressing items of intel were known, adding weight to the decision made. Then there was the Munich performance and the fantastical escalation in shelling which IMO made for consensus within Russia's Security Council. The steps taken afterward are all known and done to keep within the legality of the UN Charter.

We know Putin and team have promised Ukraine will be demilitarized, pacified and denazified; and for the latter to be successful, a very long period of probation/tutelage/chaperoning and economic rehabilitation will be required for the roots of the problem have been present since the end of WW1--yes WW1--5+ Generations of historical memory that needs adjusting until no dormant seeds remain.

Now all of that's just related to the immediate problem at hand. The bigger problem is that of Neoliberalistic Fascism led by the Outlaw US Empire and the UK where the modern roots of that disease reside and have reinfected Europe. Of the Russians on the Security Council, I know the views of three--Lavrov, Patrushev and Medvedev--toward this greater problem of Western Fascism that nurtured and promoted Ukrainian Nazism: It must be irradicated. Putin hasn't been as specific, but IMO he agrees but is cautious about the cost of the task. The other views are currently unknown by me. But let's revisit the security proposal. No Offensive weapon systems inside nations on Russia's borders and rolling NATO back to its 1997 status were two besides concluding new agreements based on the concept of Indivisible Security, which happens to be what the UN Charter says should be the norm.

So, based on Russia's bottom-line for its security and the remaining problem of Global Fascism in the form of the Outlaw US Empire and its NATO vassals, what conclusion can be drawn?

What I see is a multigenerational struggle for the Multipolar World's formation atop the dying body of the Outlaw US Empire and its NATO/EU and other vassals--Japan, South Korea, Australia, New Zealand, and Ireland. Just as Russia cannot abide a Nazified Ukraine, it cannot abide a Fascist Europe. And what's being said about Russia also goes for China and those nations that will form the Multipolar World based on a revitalized and reformed UN. Falling with the Outlaw US Empire will be the 4,000+ year-long Class War between Debtors and Creditors as the world finally reverts to a communalistic basis emphasizing Win-Win, while Zero-sum becomes an historical relic.